Springfield Thunder SC

Legal name: Springfield Soccer Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311339496
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2018
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Springfield, OH, USA
Phone
9375726055
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$106,946
Expenses
$125,550
Assets
$112,512
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT CULTICE (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY YOUNG (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SCOTT CULTICE (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY YOUNG (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL FISSEL (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide youth players the opportunity to play soccer at more competitive levels through age-appropriate player development, fair play, ethical conduct, and sportsmanship, ensuring the program is for the youth of the community and not influenced by personal goals.

What it reported doing in 2018

Teach and develop soccer skills in boys and girls in the surrounding community with training, games and tournaments

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -72.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.