Springfield Right to Life

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371281049
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Springfield, IL, USA
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$146,815
Expenses
$72,703
Assets
$289,168
Liabilities
$26,041

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tim Moore (President)
  • Suzanne Moss (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Elena Bryjka (Office Manager)
  • Kimberly Mcgowan (Board Member)
  • Kim Lesko (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To present detailed factual information on such topics as the development of the baby the effects of abortion post-abortive recovery and euthanasia. We provide information to the general public and concerned groups as a means to make informed decisions concerning these vital areas of human life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Newsletter - provide information on the organization accomplishments activities current events and issues impacting the mission on the local state and national level. Distributed to 3000 constituents

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 7.2%; rating input score 7
  • Program expense ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 13

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.5%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.98; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 7.2% of revenue deployed · 12.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.