Spotsylvania High School Marching Band Booster Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800652578
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Spotsylvania, VA, USA
Phone
5404554389
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,740
Expenses
$57,793
Assets
$33,943
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA ARMENTROUT (PRESIDENT)
  • BRITTANY PULES (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JESS TADLOCK (DIRECTOR OF STUDENT AFFAIR)
  • AMY BISCOE (HOSPITALITY)
  • LAURA ARMENTROUT (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of this organization is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, or scientific purposes under section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code.

What it reported doing in 2024

Encourage and maintain an enthusiastic interest within the school and community in various activities of the marching band (including but not limited to the drum line, auxiliary, and any other associated groups), academic bands, band related performance groups (such as winter guard and winter drum line) and any other band related groups that may come into existence at a future time, that are associated with the spotsylvania high school and to lend all possible support, both moral and financial, to the spotsylvania high school band activities, and its members with main emphasis on its extra-curricular activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 97% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.