Sports Medicine Institute
Legal name: Sports Medicine Institute International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943256879
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Phone
- (650) 322-2809
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,747,601
- Expenses
- $2,560,728
- Assets
- $1,797,861
- Liabilities
- $598,973
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENDRA FADIL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK FADIL (KEY EMPLOYEE): $586,072 total reported compensation
- KENDRA FADIL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $240,494 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To optimize your performance potential and minimize setbacks.
What it reported doing in 2024
Research: to promote research, clinical development, and delivery to the public of functional health services, nutrition, and advanced manual therapy treatments, particularly in the fields of injury prevention, injury rehabilitation, and athletic performance. Smi's research is also demonstrated through our athletic education program and recovery center (see part b). Research is also done by our eastern medicine department to see how acupuncture helps people with recovery from post-surgical procedures as well as for performance. This year the emphasis of the research was done on dry needling. Dry needling is a technique specific to trigger points. It is a modality that is in high demand in the athletic community and is often prescribed by md's and physical therapists. We have 15 advanced manual therapists who have been continuing education within their training. We hold educational clinics free of charge for our therapists as well as many teams in the area. We donate over 400 hours to various groups and to individuals that we feel can really benefit from our services. That works out to be about $80,000 worth of revenue.mark fadil's book on foam rolling, a previous research project, has provided a core concise way to visualize and perform multiple exercises to help enhance one's health and well-being. About 75,000 have been sold to date. Our long-term goal is still to set up an education center to educate practitioners. This past tax period our director has participated in the acusport education and sports acupuncture program (sma). This course has helped treat injuries from a true integrated perspective which is very state of the art in this field and has helped many people in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $586K · 5 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.