Sports Business Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832165749
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
3036675957
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,200
Expenses
$62,289
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark McIntosh (President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark McIntosh (President)
  • David Wirth (Secretary)
  • John Greene (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provides at-risk students relevant and engaging learning experiences in the sports-business industry through sports-thematic educational opportunities, sport-business industry connections, and community engagement programming. The organization partners with schools in the Denver metropolitan area having increasing populations of at-risk youth students. At-Risk means students fall into one or more of the following categories: Public assistance, low socio economic status, homelessness, developmental/disability challenges, emotional challenges, foster children, juvenile justice experiences, and drop out candidates.

What it reported doing in 2022

Organized Sports Business Academy, a Colorado non-profit corporation. Fiscal year ended 5/31/2023, chose to close entity, following making a $50,000 donation to the Sports Business Management degree program at Metropolitan State University, Denver ColoradoPrior years - Engaged architect to begin potential design of the Irv Brown Sports Academy facility at the Arvada High School (where Irv coached during his career), Arvada, Colorado.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,731.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -66.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -50.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45% of revenue deployed · 1.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $990 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.