Sport For Impact Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933117204
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 8587293456
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,721
- Expenses
- $41,109
- Assets
- $93,185
- Liabilities
- $5,750
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rebecca Fredette (President)
People named in this filing
- Rebecca Fredette (President)
- Angelea LaChica (Secretary & Treasurer)
- Leigh Ann Brown (Trustee/Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We help players maximize their influence for social good and directly impact the causes and communities they care about. In addition to fiscal sponsorhip and philanthropic advising, SFI's value extends further providing player-to-player mentorship, connections, education, unparalleled access, and essential resources and networks enabling athletes to optimize and scale their vision for change.
What it reported doing in 2024
Through its dynamic Athlete Impact Network, SFI exponentially extends the influence and impact of athlete-led sports philanthropy. Uniting players with shared purpose and mission through engagement in cause-driven coalitions, positions athletes as credible messengers at the forefront of social impact. Powered by collective action, the SFI Athlete Impact Network is uniquely poised to build awareness, shift narratives, mobilize communities, drive systemic change, and directly support charitable initiatives across the globe through the transcending power of sport and influence of athletes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.1%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.1% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.