Spiritual Intervention Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861394293
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,135
Expenses
$18,113
Assets
$986

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH LOU (President)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH LOU (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Spiritual Intervention Ministries was formed to address the need of displaced Africans through a more personal approach by providing a spiritual community of support to wraparound the social services that are needed.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2019, Elizabeth began Revival Groups RG in hopes to build community, foster belonging, and identity needs among Africans and provide a safe place to process the challenges of life. SIM hosts RG to address the need of displaced Africans through a more personal approach by providing a spiritual community of support to wraparound the social services that are needed. Additionally, SIM aims to empower refugees and immigrants to be a part of the solution by providing opportunities for members of the community to give back to others. Specifically, SIM will use our resources and the Foundation's support to provide the following support for our communities: 1-Providing resources- Financial assistance- helping families making rent, 2-Social services navigation- Helping families apply for welfare, Medical, etc., because the process is difficult for ESL speakers 3-General spiritual/emotional support to help people with depression and stresses

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.