Spiral Duct Manufacturers Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364119603
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9722339107
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,726
- Expenses
- $121,446
- Assets
- $245,112
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KYLE BRUMLEU (Vice President)
- ROBIN STEGALL (President)
People named in this filing
- KYLE BRUMLEU (Vice President)
- JOHN NEWLAND (Director)
- DAVID KRUPP (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The spiral duct manufacturers association (spida) was formed to promote the use of round duct, spiral duct (spiral pipe) and flat oval duct by informing the public of its advantages, supporting testing and research of round duct and spiral pipe, and providing manufacturers with specialized information necessary to the efficient operation of the business of the members.spida's membership is composed of companies engaged in the fabrication of round duct, spiral duct, flat oval duct, round duct fittings, and related items within the north american continent.
What it reported doing in 2024
Spida standards assure customers that their supplier understands the industry and strives to provide the highest quality standard.meetings and conventions educate members on new products and development in the industry and bring the use of round duct, spiral duct and flat over duct to the attention of the general public. More than 50 members attended the annual meeting.spida publishes an annual membership directory, newletters and other publications.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.7%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.7% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.