Spinal CSF Leak Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471141080
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Spokane, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5096764112
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,854
- Expenses
- $120,953
- Assets
- $353,170
- Liabilities
- $15,220
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jodi Ettenberg (President)
- Kyle Spawn (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jennifer Schoon PT DPT (Director)
- Martha Bond (Director)
- Jodi Ettenberg (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Spinal CSF Leak Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing the suffering of any person affected by intracranial hypotension or spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Spinal CSF Leak Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing the suffering of any person affected by intracranial hypotension or spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The organizations educational programs provide broad public benefit by increasing access to accurate medical information, improving health literacy, reducing diagnostic delays, and strengthening community support. Online educational resources on the Spinal CSF Leak Foundations website this year included expanding a Physician Directory, increasing patient and clinician resources about spinal CSF leak, and adding to an extensive online educational video library. More than 800 individuals from the United States and internationally registered for the Spinal CSF Leak Foundations annual Spinal CSF Leak: Bridging the Gap Conference, where the attendance was free for patients worldwide whether attending in person or virtually. This unique conference integrated physician and medical professional presentations with patient presentations sharing lived experience of the condition, and the agenda included both physician, medical professional, and patient perspectives in diagnosis, imaging, management, interdisciplinary care, and emerging research. All sessions were recorded and later published with transcripts on the Spinal CSF Leak Foundations website, at no cost, further expanding access to educational content for individuals facing financial, geographic, health, or mobility barriers. During the fiscal year, the Spinal CSF Leak Foundation responded to 181 patient inquiries submitted through its website, along with hundreds of additional messages received through email, social media, and the Inspire support community. While medical advice cannot be provided, the Spinal CSF Leak Foundation offered educational guidance and referrals to reputable resources to help individuals better understand their condition, navigate care, and communicate more effectively with clinicians and loved ones. The Spinal CSF Leak Foundation also provided an educational grant supporting the 2025 Intracranial Hypotension Conference, an international scientific meeting with leaders in the field. As a result of this grant, the Spinal CSF Leak Foundation was able to share video replays and transcripts from the conference on its website and social media, further expanding access to no-cost educational content and reducing barriers for the spinal CSF leak community. These videos are not available elsewhere online and provide an important resource for patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.5%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 37.5%; rating input score 38
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.5% of revenue deployed · 37.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.