Spina Bifida Assocation of Jacksonville Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237432288
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9046996640
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,737
- Expenses
- $254,121
- Assets
- $1,216,390
- Liabilities
- $22,631
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DEMERY WEBBER (EXECUTIVE DI): $37,921 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Spina bifida of jacksonville, established in 1973, is a 501(c)(3) non- profit organization dedicated to supporting individuals and families affected by spina bifida. Their mission focuses on advocacy, education, and providing essential services to the local community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy and education: the organization actively raises awareness about spina bifida, a neural tube defect resulting from the spine's failure to close properly during early pregnancy. We provide information and support to families, helping them navigate the challenges associated with the condition. Support programs: spina bifida of jacksonville offers various programs, including: -medical resources: provide information and specialized medical resources. We also provide medical reimbursements for medically necessary items not covered by insurance. -medical supplies: assisting families in obtaining necessary medical equipment. -medical education opportunities: sponsor families at an annual disabilities and medical services convention. -transportation resources: offering support for transportation needs. -family socials and gatherings: events and dinners for the whole family catered to their unique needs. "love what drives you" campaign: this initiative collaborates with the automotive community to enhance mobility for families affected by spina bifida. The campaign focuses on updating vehicles with ramps and adaptive equipment, which are then donated to families in need. Our goal is to "fuel independence in the spina bifida community." fostering community partnerships to raise funds and open up opportunities for our families. The amelia concours is an example. Annual jacksonville grand prix: spina bifida of jacksonville organizes the jacksonville grand prix, a go-kart racing event that has raises approximately 10,000 for the organization. This event not only serves as a fundraiser but also as a unique community gathering to support the cause. Avonlea antiques and art booth is stocked with donated items. Not only is it great exposure for us but is also good advertising. Through these initiatives, spina bifida of jacksonville continues to make significant strides in supporting individuals and families impacted by spina bifida, fostering a sense of community, and enhancing the quality of life for those affected.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -160%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.79; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -32.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $254K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.