Spence-chapin Services to Families and Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131834590
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123690300
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adoption
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,130,493
- Expenses
- $11,778,829
- Assets
- $66,368,041
- Liabilities
- $8,594,282
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YEKATERINA TRAMBITSKAYA (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- YEKATERINA TRAMBITSKAYA (CEO): $366,414 total reported compensation
- LINDA ALEXANDRE MURRAY (CPO, DOMESTIC ADOPTION PROGRAMS): $252,496 total reported compensation
- CHELSEA GUFFY (CHIEF LEGAL & COMPLIANCE OFFICER): $197,080 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of spence-chapin is to help find loving families for children whatever their needs or circumstances and provide counseling and support for all children and the families to whom they have been born or entrusted.
What it reported doing in 2024
Adoption programs: domestic adoption program: we find families for infants and children domestically. We prepare families for adoption through trainings, counseling, and support prior to and after placement. Services for birth and expectant women and families: we provide comprehensive options counseling to women and their partners who are contemplating an adoption before or after birth. Spence-chapin provides the option of interim care for the baby and provides all supplies and medical visits. For women who choose adoption, spence-chapin offers them counseling and support pre and post placement and at any time thereafter. This includes free independent legal counsel.continued on schedule ointernational adoption: we find families for children from multiple countries (south africa, colombia, jamaica, antigua and barbuda, dominica, grenada, saint lucia, and saint vincent and the grenadines), and provide training, support, and ongoing services to the family and the child.special needs adoption: we place children with significant medical challenges including, but not limited to, rare genetic disorders, chronic prenatal exposure to drug and alcohol. We provide extensive education and training to potential families about each child's specific needs to ensure that they are prepared for the challenges of parenting children who have complex medical histories/diagnoses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.63; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $366K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $511K reported
- Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.