Speech to Text Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841977931
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Wakefield, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7818768914
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,287
- Expenses
- $76,569
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE TOWNSEND (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- ANIR DUTTA (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEVE TOWNSEND (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- ANIR DUTTA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID ROSS (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To lead the speech-to-text industry by setting standards of competance, professionalism, and service.
What it reported doing in 2023
To define, modernize, and lead an age-old industry to perpetuate standards across all technologies and connect forward-thinking businesses, practitioners, and educators, as well as to supply news and information and to do all that is necessary to protect the integrity of the legal record.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 17
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 15.5%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 20
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -59.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -81.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 15.5% of revenue deployed · 19.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.