Special Olympics Virginia Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541013637
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8043465544
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,172,533
- Expenses
- $6,996,915
- Assets
- $18,838,336
- Liabilities
- $2,841,107
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID E THOMASON (OFFICER - PRESIDENT & CEO)
- HOLLY CLAYTOR (VICE PRESIDENT, DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID E THOMASON (OFFICER - PRESIDENT & CEO): $201,620 total reported compensation
- ROY ZEIDMAN (SENIOR VP - MARKETING & DEVELOPMENT): $179,720 total reported compensation
- KIM D'ERRICO (VP - FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION): $137,294 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Special olympics Virginia, inc. Is a nonstock corporation that provides year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities at no cost to the athletes or their families. The organization (continued on schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2024
Special olympics unified champion schools (ucs) program uses sports to develop school communities where youth are agents of change, fostering respect, dignity and advocacy for people with disabilities. In collaboration with school systems across Virginia, the Virginia high school league and the Virginia department of education, the goal is to inspire the first unified generation. Ucs is aimed at promoting social inclusion through intentionally planned and implemented activities affecting systems-wide change. With sports as the foundation, the three component model - inclusive sports, inclusive youth leadership opportunities, and whole school engagement - offers a unique combination of effective activities that equip young people with tools and training to create sports, classroom and school climates of acceptance. These are school climates where students with disabilities feel welcome and are routinely included in, and feel a part of, all activities, opportunities and functions. In Virginia, we have 555 engaged schools in 59 jurisdictions, and 17,500 youth involved in unified sports programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 97
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.69; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 25 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.