Special Olympics Southern California Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954538450
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
Phone
5625021100
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,813,840
Expenses
$12,993,594
Assets
$34,423,836
Liabilities
$1,882,673

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

58 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KELLY POND (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KELLY POND (PRESIDENT & CEO): $283,479 total reported compensation
  • JANET ROSE (SVP, ADMINISTRATION/CFO): $178,417 total reported compensation
  • LAURA MAYO (CHIEF GROWTH OFFICER): $178,116 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of special olympics southern California is to provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing opportunities to develop physical fitness, demonstrate courage, experience joy and participate in a sharing of gifts, skills and friendship with their families, other special olympics athletes and the community. Our vision is to promote acceptance, inclusion, and well-being for people with intellectual disabilities through sports.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other program activities: leadership, awareness, and community engagement: special olympics southern California's other program costs include broadening opportunities for leadership, education, awareness, and community engagement. Athlete and youth leadership programs: special olympics southern California provides athletes with training to develop their leadership skills and use their voices and abilities to inspire others, influence change, and create inclusive communities. Athletes can become coaches, officials, team captains, spokespeople, board of directors members, and committee members. Athletes help guide the direction of the movement and are advocates of acceptance and inclusion for all. In 2024, they trained more athlete leaders than they have in the past eight years, and they created four new athlete leadership councils. Public education and awareness: the organization works to advocate and educate to spread the message about the importance of inclusion and the ways in which it benefits the lives of everyone and our world. With the goal of better educating the public on our programs and mission, the organization promotes its mission and programs through a variety of channels, including direct mail, printed and digital graphics, email marketing, social media, traditional media outreach, content creation, and more. Professional development for staff: this includes staff conferences and team trainings, which are part of sosc's success. By building a strong team culture and encouraging employees to grow, they are equipped with the tools to advance sosc's sports, wellness, and leadership programs. This support for employees includes year-round professional development opportunities and an annual staff conference to develop strategic plans, create consistency within program implementation, provide professional development, and build team morale. Recruitment: sosc recruits volunteers to empower athletes to reach their goals on and off the sports field, building a staff-led, volunteer-driven organization. In 2024, sosc grew volunteer support by 123% compared to 2023. Even with this increase, the organization needs more coaches and ongoing volunteers to reach more people with intellectual disabilities, schools, and communities. Employees are developing and implementing a strategic volunteer engagement plan, which includes increasing the number of skilled and capacity-building roles for volunteers within sports, wellness, and leadership programming, as well as building resources to empower volunteers. With more volunteers supporting the mission, we know we can continue to grow and serve more athletes.while 2024 was very impactful, sosc is also preparing for the future. They are shifting their fundraising approach to one that is partnership-based rather than transactional. They plan to consolidate their customer relationship management software systems from three into one. They created a technology committee, acquired new media monitoring software, developed cutting-edge coach training videos, and are in the process of launching a new website. All of this and more set the foundation for continued growth in sports, health, and leadership programs in the years to come.the impact sosc makes through the power of sports is life-changing. When they impact one athlete's life, it has a ripple effect that positively affects their family, volunteers, schools, and the entire community. In fact, it helps build a more accepting and inclusive world, which benefits all of us.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 20.6%; rating input score 21; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 42 of 42 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $283K · 58 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 21/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.