Special Olympics Minnesota Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411228157
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6123330999
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,208,237
- Expenses
- $12,100,218
- Assets
- $17,217,633
- Liabilities
- $3,846,343
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM FISH (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- DAVID DORN CONSULTANT (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM FISH (PRESIDENT/CEO): $234,273 total reported compensation
- MELISSA HOLMES (CFO): $174,295 total reported compensation
- GREG VANSELOW (COO): $167,841 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Special olympics Minnesota's mission is to create a new world of inclusion and acceptance for people with intellectual disabilities. (expanded mission on schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth and schools: young athletes is an innovative, inclusive sports play program for children with and without intellectual disabilities, designed to introduce them to the world of sports prior to special olympics eligibility at age eight. Special olympics now welcomes future athletes ages 2-7 through this developmentally appropriate and inclusive play program by pursuing these goals: engage children through activities designed to foster physical, cognitive and social development; welcome family members of children with and without intellectual disabilities to the special olympics network of support; raise awareness about the abilities of children with intellectual disabilities through inclusive peer participation, demonstrations and other events. (continued on schedule o)in 2025 young athletes reached 4,000 participants in Minnesota, resulting in over 33,000 experiences for these participants.special olympics Minnesota is currently implementing the unified champion schools program funded through the office of special education programs at the us department of education. At the end of 2025, somn was working with 418 schools considered "unified champion schools" - a number that is continuously growing. Special olympics unified champion schools program is an education and sports based strategy powered by an engaged youth community that increases athletic and leadership opportunities for students with and without intellectual disabilities, while creating communities of acceptance for all. It is a strategy to activate youth, engage educators and promote school communities of acceptance and inclusion where all young people are agents of change.there are three components of a unified champion school. Unified sports allow special education students and general education students to participate in inclusive sporting opportunities. Inclusive student leadership provides an opportunity for youth voices to be heard through engaging together in an inclusive school-recognized club and by participating in youth summits. Whole school engagement provides bullying prevention campaigns and inclusive promotion initiatives that reach entire school populations through engaging, inspiring and optimistic events. All three areas are crucial to change the culture of a school towards inclusion. In 2025, special olympics Minnesota's unified champion schools programming resulted in 852,000 experiences!
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.6%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 73.2%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.6% of revenue deployed · 73.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $234K · 26 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.