Special Needs Adoptive Parent Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820533277
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Post Falls, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2086609057
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adoption
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $861
- Expenses
- $17,544
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MONICA LANG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MILES TORRES (EXECUTIVE DI)
- KACEY WALL (SECRETARY/TR)
- MONICA LANG (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To develop permanent family connections for youth in foster care who cannot safely return home, to center recruitment efforts on each youth's individual desires for family support, and to prepare and support families before and after each permanency placement.
What it reported doing in 2020
Wendy's wonderful kids - a program funded by grants from the dave thomas foundation for adoption. This is an adoption promotion program in which specialized recruiters perform intensive and exhaustive efforts to locate an adoptive or guardian family for youth who are legally free within the foster care system.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,937.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -158.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.