Spartanburg Humane Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570481019
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Spartanburg, SC, US
Phone
864-583-4805
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,276,638
Expenses
$1,819,333
Assets
$2,375,510
Liabilities
$466,342

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGEL COX (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANGEL COX (CEO): $124,167 total reported compensation
  • SHAIL RADLOFF (EXECUTIVE DI): $109,167 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a humane method for managing the homeless animal population and to increase the live release rate while reducing the length of stay for each animal.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our next greatest accomplishment is our committment to adopting healthy animals into our community. We are treating dogs who are heartworm positive as soon as possible after intake in order to begin their "new" lives healthy and ready for permanent homes. Heartworm disease is deadly and is caused by a single mosquito bite to an unprotected dog. Traditionally, heartworm positive dogs are euthanized in most shelters because of expense, and they were euthanized at the spartanburg humane society in the past. But now we are testing them immediately and starting every dog that enters the shelter on prevention and scheduling them for treatment when necessary, but as soon as possible. Both of these measures are extremely expensive but critical to the life of the animals, so we just have to find a way to raise the money continually since our community has not fully bought into heartworm prevention. We have also increased the level of preventative medications for short-term and long-term results for all animals that enter the shelter. We have instituted an additional step in the veterinary care for each animal to ensure that everyone has received the correct core vaccines and prevention even when we are at full capacity. We test all cats for both feline AIDS and feline leukemia, so we are able to let our community know the health status of the cats they are considering for adoption. We are 100% committed to putting healthy, happy animals into our community and for those who have illnesses, we want to fully prepare potential adopters for the continued care that they will need. All animals leave our facility fully vaccinated up to their age, microchipped, spayed/neutered, and with six months of heartworm prevention. Our goal is to start these animals off on the right foot in their new home.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 68
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -42.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.