Sparklight Support Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841859766
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3013182911
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $593,321
- Expenses
- $406,199
- Assets
- $593,321
- Liabilities
- $406,199
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VERONICA LAWRENCE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- FRANSTINE WALLACE-BARNES (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $116,518 total reported compensation
- VERONICA LAWRENCE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $114,330 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide services to people with intellectual disabilites
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.5%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.5%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 68.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $406K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.