Sparkle Pink Club for Girls
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852987815
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Pensacola, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8508241510
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,124
- Expenses
- $3,366
- Assets
- $1,673
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DERIA BROWN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DERIA BROWN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ANTOINE BROWN (CHAIRMAN)
- DIVINUS STEPHENS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goal was to reach girls at a younger age, placing the dominant thought of who they are and why they exist into age appropriate encounters. Receiving the principles for leadership, value and decision making places a steel rod of confidence in their back. Girls stand bolder and make better choices. Better choices break generational cycles, increase positive educational outcomes and deliver the next generation of trailblazers, thought leaders and innovators. Sparkle pink engages girls in through local chapters, conferences, an online club and in-school programs. Our team uses the latest data and platforms to reach girls where they are.
What it reported doing in 2025
Updated sparkle pink website to include sparkle pink online live on skool. Our online tuition community lives on skool. Live group coaching sessions challenges quizzes and polls. A growing library of resources and a safe private circle for girls and parents. They are going to use technology let it be for good. Weekly challenges polls and interactions to develop confidence and real time solutions to ssues unique to girls. Resource library girls grow in a drama free zone. No mean girls in sparkle pink. Weekly accountability
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.3%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.