Spanish River Community High School Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364539080
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Boca Raton, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5612412246
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,773
- Expenses
- $61
- Assets
- $80,873
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA FEINBERG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LAURA FEINBERG (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHANIE PEREIRA (TREASURER)
- ILANA COHEN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Form 990-ez, part i, line 10 - grants / similar amts paid to organizations class of activity: academy furniture name: spanish river community hs address: 5100 jog road boca raton, fl 33496 form 990-ez, part i, line 16 - other expenses description amount expenses annual report 61 total 61 form 990-ez, part iii - primary exempt purpose the organization's primary purpose is to raise money for spanish river community high school
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization assists in funding various departments with sustainable resources to enhance the experience and education for current and future students of spanish river community high school (e.g., curriculm materials, new band instruments, athletic gear, etc.).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.7%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 96.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1,325.79; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -32.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $61 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.