Spanaway Graham Eatonville Soccer

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273597856
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Spanaway, WA, USA
Phone
2539735509
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$180,148
Expenses
$171,247
Assets
$67,350

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BARRY TOWNS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BARRY TOWNS (PRESIDENT)
  • SHALEN MCCLAIN (TREASURER)
  • CARINA VOLLMER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide recreational and competitive soccer options to rural southeast pierce county, wa to approx 450 girls and boys ages 5-18. Historically, we have only offered a fall program. We recently offered a spring program as well to compete with local clubs. Part of our mission is to keep our registration fees as low as possible to provide reasonable opportunities for our local community. Neighboring clubs are 2 and 3 times more costly than ours, which would prohibit many families from participating. We are a 100% volunteer ran club.

What it reported doing in 2018

Provide recreational and competitive youth soccer opportunities for approx 450 5 to 18 year old boys and girls. The club now offers a spring program as well as fall. We are attempting to provide an alternative to local clubs that are 2 to 5 times more costly, making these programs are cost prohibitive for many families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 65% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.3% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $150K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.