Spalding County Collaborative Auth for Families & Children Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582602454
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Griffin, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6787646297
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Personal Social Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $417,918
- Expenses
- $206,972
- Assets
- $328,907
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
People named in this filing
- ROBERT DULL (BD MEMBER)
- JEWELL WALKER-HARPS (SECRETARY)
- EULA REDDING (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the well-being and health conditions of families through a collaborative system of physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual supports.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mentoring the griffin-spalding county mentor program began in 2012 through the combined efforts and generous contributions of the griffin-spalding county chamber of commerce, the griffin housing authority, and griffin-spalding county school system. The mentor program matches caring adults with students in the griffin-spalding school system who would benefit from having a volunteer to help on their path to becoming successful adults. A mentor acts as a listner, a role model and a friend. Children who are mentored have better school attendance, better attitudes toward school, a greater likelihood of completing school and less substance abuse than non- mentored students. Mentors interact with their mentee on school premises once each week for a meal, school program, game, or conversation. The program requires a one-year commitment, but mentor-mentee pairings are encouraged to extend beyond the first year. The mentor visiting schedule is flexible during school hours. On-campus group mentoring pograms and off- campus group mentoring programs have been added to expand the program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.5%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $207K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $104K reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.