Space Coast League of Cities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510580775
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Rockledge, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3214217171
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Coalitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,701
- Expenses
- $96,269
- Assets
- $172,495
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- STEVE OSMER (DIRECTOR)
- DON WILLIS (DIRECTOR)
- MICHAEL BLAKE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The league is a non-partisan, non-profit membership organization that represents a number of municipalities of the space coast and a number of associate governments, non-profits and business associations. The purpose is to promote and advance the collective interest of the municipalities of the space coast in Florida; to study municipal issues and seek desired results through cooperative effort; to respect the principles of home rule.
What it reported doing in 2025
League dinners - the space coast league of cities holds a number of dinner meetings. These dinners are open to the elected officials and their guest and other members. The purpose of the dinner is primarily educational in nature. Alternating host jurisdictions choose a location for the dinner and issues that are current and of concern to the voting members are discussed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.8%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.