Space Coast Community Development Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473214862
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Melbourne, FL, USA
Phone
3217751574
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$9,351
Assets
$34,176

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michael Bean (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Michael Bean (President & CEO)
  • Rene Jon Turla (Vice Chairman)
  • Martin Hindsley (Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Including but not limited to, for such purposes of providing affordable housing, healthcare, food, employment training, educational resources, for extremely low, very low, low and/or moderate income families; neighborhood revitalization; establishing sustainable economic initiatives; developing strategies and programs for job creation within the community; entrepreneurial initiatives; small business creation and/or expansion and training for jobs that offer or promote upward mobility; and engaging in any other legal activity including, but not limited to, any such legal activity not prohibited to corporations under the Florida Not-For-Profit Corporation Act that is in furtherance of federal tax-exempt charitable purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

SCCDC provides employment and skills training through the continuation of the lawn mowing crew which employs public housing residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.65; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.