Space 4 Art Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274003216
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192697230
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $506,927
- Expenses
- $485,065
- Assets
- $1,066,318
- Liabilities
- $805,611
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Emily Knapp (President)
People named in this filing
- Emily Knapp (President)
- Anna Gallich (Treasurer)
- Linda Litteral (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish a dynamic creative center where artists live work mentor youth and interact with the community in an innovative and educational environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Space 4 Art serves as a diverse affordable creative incubator inclusive cultural venue and community based arts-education center via 1 23 affordable spaces in which 35+ artists live work teach collaborate and share their work with the community through educational outreach and cultural events 2 free project-based STEM- and healing-based arts programming for students in schools and organizations in under-resourced neighborhoods and 3 free to low-cost arts and cultural events for the public at large.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $354K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 46 of 46 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.