Southwestern Invitational Golf Tournament

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850674771
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Oak Park, CA, USA
Phone
8182665454
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Digestive Disease, Disorder Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,680
Expenses
$68,507
Assets
$48,886
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CHARLEY JOHNSON (DIRECTOR)
  • CHRIS HARRISON (DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL BEARD (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance the development of student athletics through competition. To provide a platform for those student athletes to advance in their chosen professional career by increasing their experience, interaction with others, and to heighten visibility to those who may be able to accommodate upon graduation.

What it reported doing in 2021

The organization was formed in 2020 for the sole purpose of hosting charitable golf tournaments for student athletes at north ranch country club in westlake village, ca. The second annual tournament was held in january of 2022.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.4%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.8%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 68% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 175.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.4% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $68K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.