Southwestern Indiana Master Gardener Assoc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352148877
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Inglefield, IN, USA
Phone
8124594334
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Garden Club, Horticultural Program

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,567
Expenses
$66,395
Assets
$424,474

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUDY HALSTEAD (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA STOCKS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JUDY HALSTEAD (PRESIDENT)
  • KARIN HAMMOND (VICE PRESIDE)
  • TAMARA MORRICAL (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Horticultural education

What it reported doing in 2025

Swimga's merit scholarship recipient is selected by the office of academic programs with approval of the head of horticulture and landscape architecture department and dean of the college of agriculture. The recipient (1) must have graduated from a gibson, posey, vanderburgh, or warrick county, Indiana high school; (2) must be a full time student in the department of horticulture and landscape architecture at purdue, and (3) majoring in a horticulture related field with a minimum 3.0 cumulative grade point average. Swimga's scholarship is selected by the office of academic programs with approval of the head of horticulture and landscape arhitecture department and dean of the college of agriculture. It will be awarded based on the financial need as determined by purdue's division of financial aid. The recipient (1) must have graduated from a gibson, posey, vanderburgh, or warrick county, Indiana high school; (2) must be a full time student in the department of horticulture and landscape architecture at purdue, and (3) majoring in a horticulture related field with a cumulative grade point average of 2.65. Purdue university does the selecting subject to their selection rules which cover the equal opportunity issues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 73.3%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.5%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.39; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 73.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.