Southwest Regional Rehabilitation Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237117185
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Battle Creek, MI, USA
Phone
2699653206
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, Specialty

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-239,920
Expenses
$569,769
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JIM HETTINGER (CHAIRPERSON)
  • DAVID RILEY (VICE CHAIRPERSON)
  • KELLY BOLES-CHAPMAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Southwest regional rehabilitation center is committed to the care and improvement of human life. In recognition of this commitment, we continue to strive to deliver high quality, cost effective health care services in the community and region we serve.

What it reported doing in 2016

Inpatient rehabilitation - treatment in an inpatient rehabilitation setting is different than treatment in a typical hospital. Rehabilitation takes a holistic, or total, approach to the healing process. Our aim is to work with our patients to return to doing the basic activities of daily life they did before their illness or injury, such as walking, getting in and out of bed, and getting dressed. Working with the rehab team, each patient receives 3 hours of individual therapy throughout the course of the day, 7 days a week. And though we do ask our patients to try new things, we encourage them to express their preferences and to attain their goals in the way that is most important to them. We are committed to patient comfort and safety. We promise to partner with our patients to assure safe, quality care during their stay. We also promise an individualized pain management program to acheive maximum benefit from therapy.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 58.8%; rating input score 59
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -337.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -77.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -28.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $335K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.