Southwest District Kiwanis Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237393201
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5058216292
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,231
- Expenses
- $135,050
- Assets
- $907,878
- Liabilities
- $68,127
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BOB BREIDENBACH (PRESIDENT)
- CANDIE DROUIN (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- BOB BREIDENBACH (PRESIDENT)
- CANDIE DROUIN (PRESIDENT EL)
- PATTI STONE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The vision of the southwest district kiwanis foundation is to build ethical productive leadership in young people and to help provide quality professional development and support in a fast changing world. The organization's mission is to develop young people who are self directed life long leaders and learners; to promote and provide the essential skills and positive leadership traits; to provide a safe, healthy and professional educational environment; to be a resource to empower good work ethics in young leaders; and to empower student leadership through partnerships with parents, youth groups, kiwanis clubs in the southwest district and throughout the world, and individuals who want a productive future for our youth.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization's programs include a "key leader" weekend leadership program for high school and graduating 8th grade students. The goal of this program is to inspire young people to achieve their personal best through service leadership. The organization maintains the "kamp kiwanis" facility which is situated in a ponderosa pine forest in the zuni mountains and is used for church retreats and groups and is perfectly suitable for boy and girl scouts and other youth organizations because it also functions as an outdoor classroom to teach life sciences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.72; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $131K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.