Southwest Brooklyn Industrial Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112508370
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7189653100
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,330,734
- Expenses
- $1,414,788
- Assets
- $1,954,999
- Liabilities
- $618,523
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSE SOLOMON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JESSE SOLOMON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $183,479 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Southwest brooklyn industrial development corporation provides advocacy and services to help businesses in the sunset park, red hook and gowanus neighborhoods grow and create employment opportunities for local residents.
What it reported doing in 2024
As we have since 1978, sbidc has worked tirelessly to ensure that the industrial core of southwest brooklyn remains strong and that it remains a center of opportunity for workers throughout the area. Our unique combination of direct business services, workforce development and training, entrepreneurship training, community planning and revitalization, and advocacy helped businesses throughout southwest brooklyn thrive in a market and a city that can be challenging for manufacturers and other industrial businesses. Challenges include a competitive real estate market that prioritizes residential and commercial tenants over industrial ones; supply chain challenges; rising costs of doing business in an urban environment; and a competitive labor market.since july 2024, sbidc supported over 200 industrial employers seeking help with complex financing programs, new business development opportunities, recruiting employees, navigating government regulations, and large-scale rezoning proposals in brooklyn. Sbidc offers business education programming focused on business development strategies and financial growth. In 2025, sbidc also launched a new program called we source, which aims to connect local small businesses to opportunities in the offshore wind sector and larger green economy. As part of this project, we are providing 20 firms with direct procurement assistance and 40 hours each of business consulting support specific to the green economy and offshore wind sector. In addition to our new programs, we also offered two semesters of our plan for growth business education course, an 8-week program that helps mwbes and dbes create a plan for growth. The program included courses on marketing, financing, chart of accounts, customer discovery, and more. We graduated 40 businesses from these plan for growth cohorts. To date, the program has graduated over 160 business owners. We also hosted four webinars on credit counseling and accessing financing throughout the year. Finally, we hosted two large networking events for small businesses. Sbidc's workforce 1 center includes a staff of four full-time workforce development professionals. Our job developers helped place 180 people in full time industrial jobs this year. Our career services manager and recruitment specialist saw over 1000 customers, helping them with career counseling, resume building, and referrals to wrap around services. The team also placed 182 people in full-time industrial jobs. Sbidc continued to advocate for the industrial working waterfront. We joined the brooklyn marine taskforce to advocate for maritime industry throughout the industrial business zone. We also increased our real estate assistance services, helping two small manufacturers locate in a new industrial building in gowanus.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $39.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $183K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.