Southside Hornets Athletic Associa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311549106
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$106,383
Expenses
$111,659
Assets
$629

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Patrick Brown (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Patrick Brown (Executive Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Triple Threat Sports Club TTSC under the Southside Hornets Athletic Association offers structured programs in football basketball and cheerleading that combine athletic training with mentorship character development and family engagement. Through its UNITY System featuring GLUE youth leadership and PASS parent empowerment TTSC supports holistic youth and family growth with trauma-informed culturally responsive practices. While expanding services to meet increasing community needs the organization frequently covers program costs out of pocket to ensure access for all families especially those facing economic hardship.

What it reported doing in 2023

Program Service 1: TTSports Club TTSC..TTSports Club provided structured football basketball and cheerleading programs for 150 youth focused on athletic training mentorship and character development. TTSC activities emphasized life skills such as teamwork discipline and academic motivation while promoting physical health and community belonging. Many families faced financial hardship and the organization often covered program expenses out of pocket to ensure full access. Although not the primary recipient TTSC was partially supported by a $50,000 grant awarded to expand UNITY System efforts. A portion of this funding helped offset TTSC-related costs and contractor compensation ensuring continued program delivery during the growth and recovery phases.Program Service 2: UNITY System GLUE + PASS + MIND Over Guns..The UNITY System expanded youth and family engagement services through trauma-informed culturally responsive programming. GLUE Graceful Leaders Understanding Education served 78 youth with leadership training life skills and social-emotional development. PASS Parents and Student Success supported 56 parents through family engagement events workshops and incentive-based activities that encouraged school and community involvement. UNITY also launched its first MIND Over Guns Campaign introducing youth to nonviolent conflict resolution and emotional regulation strategies. Additionally the Simulation of Poverty event brought together youth educators mental health professionals funders law enforcement and families to foster empathy and promote cross-sector collaboration. A $50,000 grant supported the full implementation of the UNITY System in a local elementary school and also contributed to associated program staffing and infrastructure.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.1%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 65.9%; rating input score 66

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -161.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.1% of revenue deployed · 65.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $74K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.