Southgate Youth Football Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954321732
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
South Gate, CA, USA
Phone
3235473154
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$222,288
Expenses
$218,153
Assets
$6,331
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LORA L GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW ALBIDREZ (VICE PRESIDENT-FOOTBALL)
  • CRYSTAL ALBIDREZ (VICE PRESIDENT OF CONCESSIONS)
  • SARAH M GONZALEZ (VICE PRESIDENT OF CHEER)

People named in this filing

  • LORA L GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW ALBIDREZ (VICE PRESIDENT-FOOTBALL)
  • AMANDA R GONZALEZ (SPIRIT DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community-based youth flag/tackle & cheerleading program teaching the fundamentals of each sport; a youth sport program that provides the fundamental nurturing experiences that build a strong foundation for future success in sports & life. We offer the opportunity for young student-athletes to nurture their competitive spirit, to build new friendships while being a member of a team; to understand the benefits of hard work, team work, sportsmanship & discipline. For youth ages 5-14.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program services business needs: postage, printing-copying, licenses, internet, background checks & coach certifications, first-aid-cpr-aed certification, refunds, bank debits, snack bar purchases, field & facility, covid/ppe, registration materials, general administrative supplies, telephone-wifi, travel & meetings, taxes & filing fees, national membership/member fees, equipment container & computer-printer-software. The above program services provide the organization the opportunity to continue its business service as usual in the area of communications, program education to parents through meetings and parent packets, registration materials which outline our conditions of participation, general business filings with city and state entities, provide general office supplies to generate informative materials to board, staff and parent groups, upkeep of social media sites, maintain an active bank account, conduct background checks on all adult volunteers, provide coach certification through online services, conduct in-house coaches & team manager training meetings, and other to continue to provide a structured youth organization and maintain a line of chain of command.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.1%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $218K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.