Southern States Rhinology Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260673138
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Norcross, GA, USA
Phone
7706130932
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,958
Expenses
$133,576
Assets
$102,410
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KARRIE KIRWAN (ASSOC. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • TARA M MORRISON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN M DELGAUDIO MD (DIRECTOR)
  • STIL KOUNTAKIS MD PHD (DIRECTOR)
  • RODNEY J SCHLOSSER MD (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objectives of this society shall be to promote the highest possible standards of clinical practice, education, and research in rhinology, surgery, and related disciplines; to promote the public interest relating to rhinology; and to provide a forum for the discussion of medical and practice-related problems.

What it reported doing in 2025

The society conducts the annual southern states rhinology course which includes presentations on topics for the practicing rhinologists and sinus surgeons, as well as a hands on lab. The course is designed to provide a comprehensive update on both the medical and surgical practice of rhinology. The conference is a three day live educational event. The southern alliance for physician specialties cme designates this educational activity for a maximum of 14.75 ama pra category 1 credit(s).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.