Southern Pipliners Union
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831408175
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Livingston, LA, USA
- Phone
- 2253941860
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,419
- Expenses
- $27,671
- Assets
- $20,028
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICK D MALONE (President)
- JEREMY BREEDEN (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- PATRICK D MALONE (President)
- JEREMY BREEDEN (Vice President)
- RYAN WATTS (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To act as the Bargaining Agency between the field and field office employees of the ExxonMobil Pipeline Company in the State of Louisiana, except certain employees in North Louisiana who, by previous agreement, are represented by another bargaining agency and the Management of ExxonMobil Pipeline Company. To promote cooperation between the employees and management to give employees a voice in matters of mutual interest, including wages, hours of work, safety, sanitation, and other working conditions to provide an orderly and expeditious procedure for the prevention and adjustment of differences and to afford a means through which employees may be furnished information of mutual interest by the management and to promote the principles of the Southern Pipe Liners Union and advance its welfare to bring into closer association the members of said Southern Pipe Liners Union and to negotiate and sign agreements with the Management of ExxonMobil Pipeline Company.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -122.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.