Southern Ohio Medical Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
310678022
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Portsmouth, Ohio, US
Phone
(740)-356-5000
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$630,867,880
Expenses
$554,918,625
Assets
$670,627,489
Liabilities
$192,346,766

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BENJAMIN GILL (DIRECTOR-PRESIDENT & CEO-SOMC)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTOPHER G BELTON DO (DIRECTOR-CHIEF OF STAFF ELECT): $1,134,203 total reported compensation
  • JESSE P HOUGHTON MD (DIRECTOR-CHIEF OF STAFF): $1,026,437 total reported compensation
  • BENJAMIN GILL (DIRECTOR-PRESIDENT & CEO-SOMC): $828,053 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At SOMC, our mission is to make a difference.

What it reported doing in 2024

What we do: southern Ohio medical center is an active member of the communities it serves and is involved in various programs and activities throughout the area. Community is what drives somc to achieve excellence in healthcare and to make a difference in the lives of those around us. The economic, educational, recreational and cultural activities of the local area show the wide sweep of somc's community involvement and their efforts to build and maintain strong relationships. All patients are treated reguardless of their ability to pay.it's through these relationships that somc has been recognized for many outstanding accomplishments, receiving such notable honors as ancc's magnet recognition, osha's vpp star status, press ganey's distinctive workplace award, as well as being named one of fortune's 100 best companies to work for. Key decisions made at somc are guided by five strategic values: safety, quality, service, teamwork and finance. Relationships shape many facets of customer service and the care that is provided within the hospital. It is the hospital's goal to listen and partner with customers to make a difference to those we serve. Additional feedback is also gathered through focus groups conducted by the somc community relations department, as well as the somc executive team's ""open door policy,"" which both provide the opportunity to gather information and suggestions to improve hospital services and understand technological needs. Somc partners with the national research corporation (nrc) to provide transitional care support following acute and ambulatory encounters. Nrc's connect care transitions platform performs post-discharge call-backs, leveraging automated outreach to contact patients in the critical timeframe of 24-72 hours after leaving our facility. The natural voice recognition follow-up call seeks out opportunities to improve the patient experience through addressing any remaining service concerns or clinical questions after discharge. Any concerns identified trigger an alert from the care transitions solution to an rn member of our clinical case manger team who personally returns a call for resolution or triaging. Call prompts address key issues after discharge such as prescriptions, follow-up appointments, discharge instructions, worsening health status, service concerns, post-procedural pain, etc. The connect program impacts somc's strategic values by reducing readmissions, improving patient experience and perceptions of care, and improving quality and safety outcomes. As a function of the clinical case management department, connect serves to improve clinical integration by bridging the gaps between acute, emergent, and procedural settings and the patient's home environment.somc establishes working relationships with organizations throughout the tri-state area to focus on the health and wellness of the community. Somc and its employees participate in a variety of community-based organizations including the scioto county health coalition, the portsmouth area chamber of commerce, rotary club, southern Ohio performing arts association, the portsmouth area arts council, literacy programs, school boards, committees and churches. Other participatory programs include local little league groups, leadership portsmouth, task force on domestic violence, portsmouth kiwanis service club, scioto residential services board, paramedic advisory board, salvation army, habitat for humanity and choice housing for the developmentally disabled. Somc also maintains close relationships with southern Ohio correctional facility ministries, arthritis foundation, medical reserve corp, parish nurse network, southern Ohio diabetes coalition, portsmouth bicentennial board, the shawnee state university board and the southern Ohio correctional facility community advisory board. Somc has opened 6 pharmacy to serve the public. They are located in wheelersburg, south campus, main campus, vanceburg, west union, waverly, ironton and o

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.8%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 70.6%; rating input score 71; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 58.3%; rating input score 58; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 69.8% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $444.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $43.4M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 58/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.