Southern Nevada Veterans Chamber of Commerce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863427593
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7024487820
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,450
- Expenses
- $8,067
- Assets
- $383
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LESTER LUMBAD (PRESIDENT)
- MARIO MITCHELL (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MARK AYSON (VICE-PRESIDENT:ADVOCACY)
People named in this filing
- LESTER LUMBAD (PRESIDENT)
- MARIO MITCHELL (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MARK AYSON (VICE-PRESIDENT:ADVOCACY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the Southern Nevada Veterans Chamber of Commerce (SNVCC) is to support the growth and development of both veteran-owned and patriot/veteran-advocate businesses through collaboration, advocacy and business education development in the Las Vegas metropolitan region, to include all of southern Nevada in order to achieve their own business development and success, and as a result build a stronger business community. Our primary areas of focus are to promote resources in the following 4 areas: 1) Entrepreneurship 2) Employment 3) Education, and 4) Veteran Advocacy. These 4 areas of focus will be referred to as the "4 Mission Cornerstones of the SNVCC".
What it reported doing in 2021
Organizing social networking events, entrepreneurship training workshops, fundraising to support local businesses, and other types of support services to our local business community - both veteran-owned and veteran-supporter owned.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.5%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.