Southern Dental Society of New Jersey
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 226074075
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Berlin, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 8567687786
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $75,857
- Expenses
- $86,183
- Assets
- $201,275
- Liabilities
- $6,584
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr Robert Arthur (PRESIDENT)
- Dr Jasmine Singson (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Dr Robert Arthur (PRESIDENT)
- Dr Jasmine Singson (VICE PRESIDENT)
- Dr Benedict Bachstein (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To Encourage Lay Interest in Public Dental Health and Welfare, to Cultivate the Art and Science of Dentistry, to Sustain and Elevate the Character and Goodwill of the Profession and to promote Health Education and Research
What it reported doing in 2024
Hold monthly meetings for continuing education of dentists, publish a newsletter and maintain a website for the education andbetterment of dentists in the Southern New Jersey geographical area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 52.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.