Southern Company Gas Fueling Hope Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
854309897
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4048853344
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Corporate Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,292
Expenses
$47,669
Assets
$98,548
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAVIER E MONTALVO (PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD)
  • SERENA LEVY (VICE PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JAVIER E MONTALVO (PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD)
  • SERENA LEVY (VICE PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
  • JAMES ANDERSON (TREASURER AND DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Southern company gas fueling hope fund, inc. (the fund) is formed to assist employees of southern company gas and dependent family members who have experienced financial hardship as a direct result of a catastrophic event or major medical illness. Eligible recipients may apply for up to $5,000 in financial assistance. Examples of assistance-eligible events include, but are not limited to, fire, natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornado, earthquake and flood, cancer, serious health issues and a vehicle accident with serious injuries. Officers and directors of southern company gas are not eligible for assistance.

What it reported doing in 2025

To provide financial assistance to employees of southern company gas and dependent family members who have experienced financial hardship as a direct result of a catastrophic event or major medical illness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.07; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 38.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.