Southern California Special Education Administrators Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822724667
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Palmdale, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6612590033
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,400
- Expenses
- $50,666
- Assets
- $73,554
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- SCOTT TURNER (Executive Dir.)
- JANET QUENEAU (Secretary)
- TRACY PEYTON-PERRY (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of this foundation is to equip special education professionals with the training, education, certification, support and resources necessary to meet the educational, mental, social, behavior and logistical needs of special education students within at-risk, disenfranchised and impoverished communities of need.
What it reported doing in 2025
This organization provides professional development for administrators, school psychologists, speech and language pathologists and other special education educators. The organization provides training on the following topics: speech and language supervision, monitoring special education data and analyzing disproportionate trends, legal implications on discipline, suspension/explusion, and restraint & seclusion of students with special needs, 64th annual speech language conference, school age stuttering therapy, a practical approach and school refusal. We provided professional development to over 1,600 participants throughout the fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.2%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56.8%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.