Southern California Association for Healthcare Risk Mgmt
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954130771
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Calabasas, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3107569508
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $306,397
- Expenses
- $300,684
- Assets
- $113,733
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE HACKLEY (President)
- KATHRYN BIASOTTI (Vice President)
- TERRELL MULDROW (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE HACKLEY (President)
- KATHRYN BIASOTTI (Vice President)
- WRAY RYBACK (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Southern California association for healthcare risk management's primary mission is to serve as a professional society allowing interaction and interchange with other risk managers, providing a forum for the interchange of ideas and to achieve the highest standard of healthcare risk management through education of the community. The association strives to upgrade the image and role of risk managers in the healthcare industry through the definition of purpose, responsibilities and accountabilities with healthcare risk management.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the year, southern California association for healthcare risk management's (scahrm) educational opportunities included monthly education sessions, ashrm audio conferences hosted by scahrm, and an annual conference that is highly regarded as one of the best quality conferences in the field. To every extent possible, we plan and design programs that will stimulate thoughts and actions, encourage people to grow in their role, and enlighten our members to the larger picture, including new legislative requirements, clinical considerations, loss control considerations, litigation claim management, risk finance considerations and risk prevention techniques. Board of registered nursing and continuing education units for the California state bar were provided to qualified attendees who are members of the organization at each education session. With a membership of extraordinary professionals, most of the education presentations are provided by our own membership, many of whom are certified professionals in risk management (cphrm's), fellows of the american society for healthcare risk management, and distinguished fellows of the society. As an additional mechanism to provide education and information to our members, the scahrm communication committee published a quarterly form and a monthly e-news update. We encourage and promote networking among our members by allotting time at meetings, and encouraging service on a scahrm standing committee or ad hoc task force that may form for a particular purpose. Our standing committees include the bylaws committee, the communications committee, the education committee, the membership committee, and the public relations and marketing committee. Each committee is chaired by a member of the scahrm board of directors, and each committee welcomes any member who wishes to participate in support of the organization and its mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.1%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.1% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $249K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.