Southern Arizona Business Coalition Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455305269
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5202473268
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,710
Expenses
$34,650
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM R ASSENMACHER (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
  • RICK GRINNELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM R ASSENMACHER (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
  • RICK GRINNELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN CASADEI (TREASURER AND DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sabc promotes and supports development and growth of sustainable, responsible economic opportunities in southern Arizona.

What it reported doing in 2019

Coalition promoted mining, small business and the air force base interests to the public and increased awareness about the need for business growth. The organization coordinated several public meetings along with other business and civic leaders to raise the need for a greater pro-business approach by our local government. Enough money was raised to support the goals and objectives into the new year and sustain the organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.7%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.7% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.