Southern Alleghenies Conservancy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251622102
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Huntington, PA, USA
Phone
8144722120
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,355
Expenses
$2,568
Assets
$397,142
Liabilities
$9,796

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BETH FUTRICK (CHAIR)
  • JOHN DRYZAL (VICE-CHAIR)
  • JOHN NIBERT (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cultural and natural resources preservation and enhancement

What it reported doing in 2025

Cultural and natural resources preservation and enhancement - the southern alleghenies region is rich in natural and historic resources. The water and land of the region provide the sources from which all activity in the region emanates. Conservation of these resources is the key to the future economic as well as recreational initiatives occurring within the region and the high quality of life that is derived from it. The rich history and ethnic diversity of the region is also an important component that residents take pride in and visitors find fascinating and worth interpreting. However, the resources of the region are under ever increasing strain. Additional people are discovering the attributes the region has to offer. Expanded transportation systems access to the region is now easier and faster than ever before. In addition, historic problems such as abandoned mine drainage, sediment and nutrient runoff, sewage disposal problems, loss of forested and wetland areas, destruction of historic locations and other encroachments have and continue to negatively impact the ability of the region to sustain and support the current and future demands on its resources. Southern alleghenies conservancy's initiatives are not designed to compete or hinder economic growth. Instead the goals and projects as pursued by southern alleghenies conservancy and its partners work to sustain and enhance the resources that make all types of ventures more feasible and viable by promoting the proper use rather than abuse of local resources. It is essential that the region maintains the capability to provide for not only current but future demands as well. Conservation itself is progress and provides the foundation and infrastructure on which all other ventures are built. Southern alleghenies conservancy provides unique and effective solutions to the region's natural resource conservation problems and needs. Being a regional entity, southern alleghenies conservancy can draw from the expertise and strength found throughout the area in order to focus it on a particular need in a specific location. Through direct connections and participation with local, state, and federal agencies, southern alleghenies conservancy empowers local organizations to achieve their goals. Southern alleghenies conservancy works from the bottom up by allowing grassroots organizations and citizens to self determine their goals. Southern alleghenies conservancy's land trust capability provides an opportunity to preserve and protect tracts of land through outright ownership or easements. Southern alleghenies conservancy then provides the stewardship that promotes the best conservation measures so that these resources will be able to provide for future generations. Southern alleghenies conservancy's land trust capability has also provided for the facilitation of hazardous waste clean up sites and has protected forested river corridors that bestow benefits to many miles of water and acres of land far beyond the boundaries of the southern alleghenies region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 59.8%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.5%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 154.65; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 59.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.