Southeastern Sheet Metal Contractors' Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391679462
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Wauwatosa, WI, USA
Phone
4145437622
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,160
Expenses
$33,731
Assets
$114,228
Liabilities
$13,659

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROB JOSSART (PRESIDENT)
  • DENNIS WEEKS (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • JONATHAN KOWALSKI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ROB JOSSART (PRESIDENT)
  • DENNIS WEEKS (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • BRANDON QUINN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide industry development for the contractors who are members in the association. This includes, but is not limited to: provide continuing education opportunities, provide marketing and promotional outreach for the industry and its association members, provide labor relations support with the members union-labor partners, provide advocacy with local, state and national political entities, provide financial (accounting and budget management) support for the association, organize and manage meetings for the membership including board meetings and social/professional development events.

What it reported doing in 2024

Se association provides sponsorship of, promotion of, participation in, representation at, monorting of, and reporting concerning meetings, conferences, and conventions for the business of which relates to the needs of contractors engaged in the sheet metal, hvac, and mechanical contracting industries.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.39; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.