Southeastern Michigan Health Association
Legal name: Southeastern Mi Health Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381671500
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Southfield, MI, USA
- Phone
- (313)-873-6500
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,940,780
- Expenses
- $30,337,076
- Assets
- $8,905,373
- Liabilities
- $4,858,596
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIELLE HILLIKER (PRESIDENT/CE)
- DR KENNETH COLEMAN (PRESIDENT/CE)
Highest reported compensation
- CURTIS LONG (PSYCHIATRIST): $294,369 total reported compensation
- RAOUF SEIFELDIN (WCHC MED. DI): $200,639 total reported compensation
- BEZA SAHLIE (PHYSICIAN): $194,982 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Southeastern Michigan Health Association (SEMHA) is a non-profit organization fostering collaboration among public health, healthcare, and community-based partners to improve health through risk reduction activities, contract management services, and health promotion.
What it reported doing in 2024
Immunization programs - to provide education and immunization services to infants and other at risk populations. Std/tb programs - to provide education and assist in developing and maintianing comprehensive programs to reduce the instance and prevalence of stds and tb. Mental health programs - to provide education, rehabilitation, and other treatment programs to the community. Other health programs - to provide education and other activities to enrich the health of the community. Chronic disease programs - to provide education services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 94.4% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $28.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $294K · 17 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.