Southeastern Chapter National Safety Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570419868
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Irmo, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8037326778
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,473,248
- Expenses
- $3,670,055
- Assets
- $4,044,148
- Liabilities
- $478,810
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Regina Creech (Vice President)
- Nichole Spivey (Past President)
- Pauline L Lewis MS CPE (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Todd Buehrig (Executive Direc): $173,388 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Southeastern Chapter - National Safety Council (SCNSC), a chartered chapter of the National Safety Council; has a mission to work together to save lives from the roadway to the workplace across South Carolina & Georgia. We work to achieve our mission by providing education, awareness, advocacy and prevention in three core areas: roadways, workplaces and communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Southeastern Chapter National Safety councils mission is working together to save lives from the roadway to the workplace across South Carolina and Georgia. SCNSC provides education, awareness and prevention in three core areas: roadways, workplaces and communities. On the road, SCNSC offers trainings in defensive driving to educate youth and adults about the dangers of distracted driving. In the workplace, SCNSC offers more than thirty OSHA courses to foster safe workplace environments and prepare employers and employees for every type of emergency. In the community, SCNSC offers First Aid/CPR certification that provides life-saving skills. SCNSC also takes an active role in statewide advocacy to support regulations that will yield safer communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 75% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $173K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.