Southeast Regional Sea Turtle Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452506066
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Roswell, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7724861051
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $167,118
- Expenses
- $169,258
- Assets
- $132,953
- Liabilities
- $86,301
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ray Carthy (President)
- Paul Jobsis (President-Elect, VP)
- Dean Bagley (Vice President)
- Kim Sonderman (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Ray Carthy (President)
- Paul Jobsis (President-Elect, VP)
- Meghan Koperski (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
SERSTN Program Service - supports A biennial conference for sea turtle scientists and citizen scientists providing workshops, oral and poster presentations, and social events to share research about sea turtles in the Southeast.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $133K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.