Southeast Oklahoma Victims Advocacy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421641256
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Idabel, OK, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Child Abuse, Prevention

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,493
Expenses
$132,416
Assets
$78,055
Liabilities
$9,231

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jade Box (Executive Director)
  • Carolyn White (V-President)
  • Frank Drobil (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jade Box (Executive Director): $38,400 total reported compensation
  • Jameshar Jackson (Employee): $31,680 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a comfortable, private, child-friendly setting that is both physically and psychologically safe for clients and their non-offending guardians, regardless of socio-demographic background.

What it reported doing in 2020

To provide a comfortable, private, child-friendly setting that is bothphysically and psychologically safe regardless of socio-demographic background. Gaining national accreditation gave the CAC the means to hire a forensic interviewer. To provide a comfortable, private, child-friendly setting that is bothphysically and psychologically safe regardless of socio-demographic background. Gaining national accreditation gave the CAC the means tohire a forensic interviewer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $694.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 52.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.8% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.