Southeast Asian Community Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411675917
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6125214859
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,156
Expenses
$142,117
Assets
$200,756
Liabilities
$7

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Doua Lee (Executive Dir.)
  • Yolanda Maya (Vice Chair)
  • Francisca Rivera (Board Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To build the capacity of Southeast Asian individuals and families to allow members of the Southeast Asian community to fully participate in American life while retaining important cultural vaules and traditions

What it reported doing in 2014

In carrying out the organization's exempt purpose, SEACC was able to continue support of and enhance the capabilities of each Southeast Asian families and individuals have shown significant progress toward adjusting to American society and are more self reliant. SEACC continues to work with Southeast Asian families and individuals in making economic, social, cultural, health, and personal improvement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $114K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.