South Windsor Community Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200820971
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- South Windsor, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8608711722
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $192,144
- Expenses
- $205,416
- Assets
- $258,415
- Liabilities
- $20,735
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANICE SNYDER (PRESIDENT)
- CILE DECKER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JANICE SNYDER (PRESIDENT)
- TIM FETZKO (SECRETARY)
- CILE DECKER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation is composed of volunteers organized to serve as a fiduciary to other community groups. We support fundraising efforts by other groups as well as do some of our own. We support schools and civic groups meeting charitable and educational criteria consistent with our exempt purpose.
What it reported doing in 2024
South windsor pitching batting is a group of people formed to raise funds and build a building at the south windsor legion baseball complex specifically for pitching and batting training supporting amateur sports. The effort is a public/private partnership using the south windsor community foundation as a fiduciary. They receive grants through our foundation, from both local and state governments, as well as do their own private fundraising. The building has been erected and the inside is currently being worked on. The structure is on town of south windsor property.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 11 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.