South View Middle School Parent Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411838052
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Edina, MN, USA
Phone
9528483700
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,735
Expenses
$57,856
Assets
$30,395
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHEILA SHANE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHEILA SHANE (PRESIDENT)
  • HOLLY DAU (SECRETARY)
  • TIFFANY FAHNHORST (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

E south view parent teacher organization (pto) is here to support the entire south view community - students, parents, and staff. We work together on everything from school events to fundraising to providing help and resources to south view educators. The proceeds from our fundraising are given to the south view community through teacher grants for classroom supplies and equipment. We also coordinate teacher appreciation events and coordinate volunteer for school events.

What it reported doing in 2023

The pto donates funds to help improve the student classroom and common areas for student enjoyment. An example was a sizable donation to create a courtyard area for all classrooms and students to enjoy. The pto funded a portion of the funds along with the school and district. This is an area that future generations will use. This was an area of the building that was unusable before the pto led initiative. We volunteered our time to help design and fund the construction to respond to the needs of the students/teachers for more spaces to use for learning. We also funded a salary for an extra security guard when the school needed it and was unable to fund it in the budget. This accounts for an average of 10% of our annual budget.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -42.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.